スポンサーサイト

上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。

The security treaty legislation is a violation of the constitution?representative New Komeito, Yamaguchi "The Diet and the government decide the way of the right of self-defense"

#Sorry for poor English. This article is all translated by internet translation system because I can not find the translation of this article.Why no article in English of this conference?
http://www.bengo4.com/other/1146/1287/n_3236/
Bengoshi dot com(Lawyer dot com)

Representative Natsuo Yamaguchi of the Komei Party held a press conference in association of foreign correspondent of Tokyo, Yurakucho on June 12. Over the security treaty related bill which included use acceptance of the right to collective self-defense, representative Yamaguchi emphasized, "the Diet and the government decide the way of the right of self-defense" about three constitutionalists summoned to the Diet in witnesses having pointed out, "it is unconstitutional" while he stated, "I refer to it humbly".

At the interview beginning of this day Representative Yamaguchi who was the lawyer explained interpretation of constitution Article 9 that established war renunciation and force non-maintenance as follows.
"Seemingly I am readable to prescribe demilitarization, but I show a right to live with the constitution whole sentence peacefully and prescribe it when the government and the Diet need the greatest respect for the human rights of the nation in Article 13 in the government.
It is armed attack for Japan to take the human rights of the nation most. It is allowed to have minimum self-defence capacity to remove it"

On top of that, I stated, "Japan can counterattack it by use of armed force if I brought the nation serious damage like an attack for Japan even if the attack for other countries was an opportunity", and, as for right to collective self-defense representative Yamaguchi emphasized that it was admitted restrictively. It is armed attack for Japan to take the human rights of the nation most. It is allowed to have minimum self-defence capacity to remove it"
On the other hand, in the constitution examination committee of the House of Representatives open on June 4, all three constitutionalists including Yasuo Hasebe, the Waseda University professor whom the ruling party side invited as a witness showed recognition "to be unconstitutionality" for this plan. The question for the opinion matched even an interview for representative Yamaguchi some other time.
Representative Yamaguchi replies it by the indication "to be unconstitutional" from a constitutionalist saying "you must refer to it humbly". On the other hand ,he showed the posture "that the Diet and the government must select the way of the right of self-defense, the way of the international contribution as based on a constitution".
In addition, representative Yamaguchi stated, "I have I took responsibility for the government and the ruling parties letting the understanding of the nation establish by the current Diet session that I submitted a bill to with conviction to be provided and made explanation carefully, and the nation understand it" when he was asked about the need to let the bill pass by the current Diet session from a foreign reporter.
Furthermore, whenhe was asked "there may be rather the negative effect that the nation was confused if you explained it", representative Yamaguchi stated, "there is expressions reported and argued excessively at a partial point of view" and put a nail in criticism to the government and the ruling parties over the security treaty related bill.
スポンサーサイト

コメントの投稿

非公開コメント

プロフィール

nowhere

Author:nowhere
FC2ブログへようこそ!

最新記事
最新コメント
最新トラックバック
月別アーカイブ
カテゴリ
カウンター
検索フォーム
RSSリンクの表示
リンク
ブロとも申請フォーム

この人とブロともになる

QRコード
QR
上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。